California Cultural Resources Preservation Alliance, Inc.

HOME

MISSION/SERVICES

PROJECTS AND SITES

ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORY

NATIVE AMERICAN INTERESTS

CALENDAR/EVENTS

FUNDRAISERS

CONTACT US

LINKS

 
 
PROJECTS AND SITES
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE BOLSA CHICA LAND TRUST HABITAT RESTORATION PROJECT, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA,  MARCH 2010

The Bolsa Chica Land Trust received a grant to restore 120 acres of native habitat within the lower bench of the Bolsa Chica Mesa owned by California Fish and Game.  In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and California Fish and Game Regulations, a systematic archaeological was conducted to determine whether archaeological sites are present and to provide recommendations for management planning.  Seven shellfish scatters were located and recorded.  The archaeological remains of the historic Bolsa Chica Gun Club were relocated and the site recorded updated.

This archaeological survey was conducted by CCRPA volunteers including professional archaeologists, Pat Martz, Ph.D. and Virginia Bickford, M.A., as a way to thank and support the Bolsa Chica Land Trust for saving the Bolsa Chica Mesa lower bench and wetlands from development and for their untiring efforts to preserve cultural resources and habitat on the upper bench and adjacent areas.  This project could not have been completed without the help of the intrepid crew members who volunteered their time and braved the rattlesnakes to systematically walk the 120 acres of dense vegetation and inspect the thousands of gopher holes for archaeological materials.  These included Juaneno/Acjachemem descendants: Alfred Cruz, Alfred Cruz Jr., Bill Deatherag, and Rommel Cruz, Cal Poly Pomona students (Julia Carvajal, Henry Duong, Krystal Kissinger, Sydni Kitchel, Tamara Populus, Jessica Valdez, and Maggie Villarreal), Cal State Los Angeles students (Jennie Allen, Annah Hand, and Emily Whistler), and Bolsa Chica Land Trust members (Kim Kolpin and Mike McMahan).  Steve Conkling of LSA, Inc. contributed his time, provided the use of a GPS, and prepared maps and aerial photos.  Steve James, Ph.D. conducted a records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center.  Marlinka Horack provided copies of documents and notes on the historic Bolsa Chica Gun Club.   


Image: 

THE BOLSA CHICA GUN CLUB

The Bolsa Chica Gun Club consisted of 2000 acres of beach, marshland and mesa.  It was purchased for $50 an acre for the mesa land and $5 and acre for the marsh.  The total cost was $59,991 (Claremont College Library).  In 1895, the sportsmen and hunters who organized the club, applied to the state for permission to reclaim the salt water marshlands under the State Tidelands Overflow and Reclamation act.  The concession was granted and resulted in the closing off of a natural tidal channel to the ocean as well as the construction of numerous levees to create waterfowl ponds.  As the result, the natural opening of  Bolsa Chica Bay silted up and a substitute channel connecting Bolsa Chica Bay with Anaheim Bay was cut through to the east. In 1901 a group of local farmers sued the gun club for violation of a federal law that states that tidal lands belong to the nation and cannot be privately controlled.  The powerful members of the gun club and their prestigious lawyers won the case. The farmers were outraged by the court decision and wrote a letter of protest to President Theodore Roosevelt in 1905. The club petitioned the President requesting that the dam be permitted to stand.  In 1906 the petition was granted (National Archives, Pacific Region, Laguna Niguel Office). 


In 1899, the Bolsa Chica Gun Club was incorporated with Count Jaro von Schmidt of Los Angeles listed as president.  That same year the Bolsa Chica Gun Club grounds were dedicated and the Opening Shoot was held.  The club building and associated features were probably constructed during this time (Smith 1969).

In 1913, the Santa Ana Register described the Gun Club as “more than a gun club.  It is a boating club, fishing club, a summer home club, a place to get away from the rush of business and the wear and tear of city life.”  The building was constructed of redwood.  It had dormer windows and was roofed and faced with cedar shakes.  There was a main assembly room with an immense burnt brick fireplace and card and gun rooms with fireplaces of their own.  The building had two wings consisting of 10 bedrooms with wardrobes and wash bowls.  Kitchens, pantries, wine and supply storage rooms and employee apartments completed the resort.  The grounds included a curving drive on the northside and next to this an ivy-covered arbor with hooks for hanging ducks.  Drilling for a water well on the property produced natural gas.  A large tank was placed over the well and it was tapped for cooking and lighting the club house.

RIVERSIDE CHINATOWN

CCRPA is collaborating with the Save Our Chinatown Committee (http://www.saveourchinatown.org/) and others in the fight to save the Riverside Chinatown site.

Chinese pioneers began settling and establishing businesses in downtown Riverside in the 1860s. In 1885, downtown Chinese businesses were outlawed and a new Chinatown was established outside of the downtown area. This second Chinatown included businesses, at least 450 year-round residents, and 2,500 seasonal residents. Faced with anti-Chinese sentiments and laws, the community declined after the start of the 20th century. The town was virtually abandoned by the 1930s.

In 1968, the Chinatown site was designated Riverside County Historical Landmark #8 and California State Point of Historical Interest RIV-008, and in 1974 it was designated City of Riverside Landmark #19. Regardless, the last of the standing buildings were demolished in 1977. It was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1990.

Limited archaeological excavations were conducted at the site in the mid-1980s, and revealed the presence of buried architectural features and 1000s of artifacts. The bulk of the archaeological deposits at the site remained undisturbed.

Despite the clearly recognized cultural, historical, and archaeological significance of the site, and ignoring protests by preservation advocates, Riverside County sold the site to a private land developer and, in 2008, the Riverside City Council unanimously approved construction of an office building on the site.

Legal and other efforts to save the site continue. For more information, visit the Save Our Chinatown Committee website (http://www.saveourchinatown.org/).



TOMATO SPRINGS

Beginning in 2002, CCRPA, in collaboration with local Native American representatives, including both Juaneño (Acjachemen) and Gabrielino (Tongva) elders, engaged with Irvine Community Development Company (ICDC) in an extended program of correspondence, meetings, and field trips regarding their proposed Portola Springs residential development in Irvine.

Portola Springs, consisting of hundreds of acres of formerly agricultural land, is the location of the Tomato Springs site, one of the most significant prehistoric Native American and historical Spanish sites in Orange County. In addition to this site, it also includes numerous satellite sites, reflecting long-term and diverse use of the area through prehistory and history.

Consultations began early, during the land entitlement and preliminary design stages, and resulted in a cultural resources treatment plan which included both preservation and mitigation. Preservation of the majority of the Tomato Springs site in a 100-acre archaeology park was included as were extensive archaeological excavations prior to grading in other areas. CCRPA and others entered into Memoranda of Understanding with ICDC to mutually support and implement the treatment plan.

Tomato Springs Archaeology and History Summary

The Portolá Expedition of 1769, a follow-up expedition the next year, and the Anza Expedition in 1976, visited Tomato Springs (known at the time as Los Ojitos de San Pantaleón and El Aguage del Padre Gomez). Native Americans were encountered at Tomato Springs by the 1770 Spanish expedition. The springs are shown on an 1842 map of José Antonio Sepúlveda’s land grant as Aguaje de los Tomates. According to anthropologist John Peabody Harrington’s early 20th century field notes, Native American informants identified the site as “a camping place” possibly named Usrónvana. Tomato Springs is located on the border between the traditional tribal territories of the Juaneño (Acjachemen) and Gabrielino (Tongva). The Acjachemen became known as Juaneño and the Tongva became known as Gabrielino to late 18th century Spanish missionaries at San Juan Capistrano and San Gabriel. In 1876 the Lomas de Santiago area, including Tomato Springs, was acquired as part of the Irvine Ranch.

Archaeological excavations at Tomato Springs were conducted for the Santiago Aqueduct in 1979, Portola Parkway in 1992 and 1993, and Marshburn Basin in 1997 and 1998. The Santiago Aqueduct excavations were conducted adjacent to Tomato Spring and yielded four dates ranging from 480 Before Present (BP) to 1300 BP, a period spanning the Late Prehistoric 1 period. The Portola Parkway excavations were conducted along an alignment at the base of the Lomas de Santiago and crossing a series of alluvial fans, and yielded seven dates from 60 BP to 3630 BP, including dates within the Late Prehistoric 1, Late Prehistoric 2, and Intermediate periods. The Marshburn Basin excavations, located 2.5 kilometers east of Tomato Spring, were conducted at sites deeply buried in alluvial fan deposits on the Tustin Plain and yielded ten dates from 6715 BP to 9870 BP, including incipient Milling Stone and pre-Milling Stone, Paleoindian period dates.

Excavations for Phase 1 of the Portola Springs project were conducted in 2004 and 2005 at isolated hilltop sites and at sites buried in Bee Canyon and Round Canyon alluvial fans. The excavations yielded twelve dates from 290 BP to 7490 BP. They include single dates from the Late Prehistoric 1, Late Prehistoric 2, and incipient Milling Stone periods, and nine dates spanning a time frame from the early Intermediate Period to the middle Milling Stone period.

Excavations for Phase 2 of the Portola Springs project were conducted at near-surface sites on the terminal ridge fingers above Tomato Springs and on the dissected terraces draining into Agua Chinon. The excavations yielded 20 dates ranging from modern to 3830 BP. A single date falls within the early Milling Stone period. The other dates are from the Late Prehistoric 1 and Late Prehistoric 2 periods.

Combined, the dates from Tomato Springs reflect occupations spanning a 10,000 year period. Gaps in the sequence during the late Intermediate, middle Milling Stone, and terminal Paleoindian periods suggest abandonment phases. The terminal Paleoindian period was a time of adaptation to late Pleistocene megafauna extinctions and early Holocene climate, the middle Milling Stone period was a time of heavy subsistence reliance on the seeds of grasses and weedy annuals, and the late Intermediate was a time of population pressure and social reorganization, and emerging territorial tribalism. Each hiatus may indicate periods when alternative subsistence resources were sought elsewhere in the region, or when competition for marginal resources lead to factional disputes and inter-group conflicts, and forced abandonments of the vicinity.

Excavations at Tomato Springs have revealed a variety of prehistoric features including trash middens, activity areas, grinding stations, chipping stations, hearths, roasting pits, possible sweat lodges, and two houses. Artifacts include stone tools, stone debitage from making tools, animal bone, and marine shell. Milling tools include metates, manos, mortars, and pestles for grinding wild seeds into flour, and heavy chopping, pounding, and scraping tools for processing yucca for food and fiber. Yucca fiber was used to make sandals and fishing line. Projectile points include spearheads and arrowheads for hunting and possibly warfare. Animal bone is largely of rabbits, hares, and other small animals, suggesting that collective drives were more important than taking large game with spears, darts, and arrows. Bone awls and needles, used for basket weaving and sewing leather, have been found. Marine shell is present in only small quantities, reflecting Tomato Springs inland location, and may have been brought to the site as manufacture material rather than food. A variety of marine shell beads, scoops, and scrapers have been found.


Protecting, Preserving, and Promoting Cultural Resources